{"id":45600,"date":"2019-06-23T20:38:25","date_gmt":"2019-06-23T18:38:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ethereumworldnews.com\/?p=45600"},"modified":"2020-02-19T01:56:36","modified_gmt":"2020-02-18T23:56:36","slug":"bitcoin-bull-run-validated-technical-signal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ethereumworldnews.com\/bitcoin-bull-run-validated-technical-signal\/","title":{"rendered":"Bitcoin (BTC) Bull Run was Recently Validated by This Technical Signal"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Sucker’s Rally or Bitcoin Bull Run? <\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Earlier this week, legendary gold investor Peter Schiff claimed Bitcoin (BTC) has been experiencing a “sucker’s rally”. In an impassioned tweet, the hard money advocate \u2014 who has, for some reason, taken a disliking towards supply-capped and decentralized cryptocurrencies \u2014 postulated that due to the fact that the “bubble has already burst” for Bitcoin, this upswing is unlikely to continue. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Others have also made similar suggestions, asking if BTC’s recent move past $10,000 was “one final pump” before the “Ponzi <\/a>scheme” collapses. You see, cynics have claimed that this move higher is entirely manipulated, specifically citing the correlation between the growth in Tether’s (USDT) market capitalization and BTC. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

But, according to a number of technical signals that accurately confirmed previous bull runs, this rally is just getting started. As pointed out by analyst CL207, a little-known yet astute cryptocurrency commentator, BTC recently crossed above the 1.25 standard deviations above the 50-week simple moving average line. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

This, per the historical chart seen below, has accurately predicted two previous parabolic bull runs and subsequent bearish sell-offs. So, if history is of any indication, Bitcoin’s foray past $10,000 may just be the early stages of a larger uptrend, which some analysts say<\/a> will bring BTC to $100,000 and beyond in the coming two years. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

pic.twitter.com\/7P3HJTzdWL<\/a><\/p>— CL (@CL207) June 22, 2019<\/a><\/blockquote>